About Hypnotherapy

Solu­tion Focused Therapy

The form of hyp­nother­apy prac­ticed by most Vic­to­rian hyp­no­tists, includ­ing James Braid and Hip­polyte Bern­heim, mainly employed direct sug­ges­tion of symp­tom removal, with some use of ther­a­peu­tic relax­ation and occas­sion­ally aver­sion to alco­hol, drugs, etc. This sim­ple form of treat­ment employed rel­a­tively direct meth­ods and few the­o­ret­i­cal con­structs, but has con­tin­ued to influ­ence most sub­se­quent forms of hyp­nother­apy. These days this kind of ther­apy is know as solu­tion focused work and is the back bone of the work we carry out at the West Lon­don Hyp­nother­apy Clinic.

Hyp­no­analy­sis

In 1895 Sig­mund Freud and Joseph Breuer pub­lished a sem­i­nal clin­i­cal text enti­tled Stud­ies in Hys­te­ria (1895) which pro­moted a new approach to psy­chother­apy. Freud and Breuer used hyp­no­sis to regress clients to an ear­lier age in order to help them remem­ber and abre­act sup­pos­edly repressed trau­matic mem­o­ries. Although Freud grad­u­ally aban­doned hyp­nother­apy in favour of his devel­op­ing method of psy­cho­analy­sis, his early work con­tin­ued to influ­ence many sub­se­quent hyp­nother­a­pists. How­ever, as Freud later con­ceded, his French rival Pierre Janet had already pub­lished a case study describ­ing the use of age regres­sion in hyp­notic psy­chother­apy, a few years earlier.

Sub­se­quent regres­sion hyp­nother­apy was some­times known as “hyp­no­analy­sis”, “ana­lytic hyp­nother­apy”, or “psy­cho­dy­namic hyp­nother­apy.” Many prac­ti­tion­ers worked in ways that bore only faint resem­blance to Freud’s orig­i­nal approach, although oth­ers con­tin­ued to be influ­enced by later psy­cho­an­a­lytic the­ory and practice.

Hyp­noan­analy­sis found sup­port in both world wars where it was used by mil­i­tary psy­chi­a­trists as a rapid alter­na­tive to psy­cho­analy­sis in the treat­ment of shell­shock, now known as post­trau­matic stress dis­or­der (PTSD).

Con­sid­er­able con­tro­versy devel­oped regard­ing the use of regres­sion to uncover allegedly repressed mem­o­ries in the 1990s as the result of sev­eral high-profile legal cases, where clients sued their ther­a­pists over claims of false mem­ory syndrome.

Erick­son­ian hypnotherapy

Mil­ton H. Erick­son was one of the most influ­en­tial hyp­no­tists of the 20th cen­tury. From around the 1950s onward, Erick­son devel­oped a rad­i­cally dif­fer­ent approach to hyp­no­tism, which has sub­se­quently become known as “Erick­son­ian hyp­nother­apy” or “Neo-Ericksonian hyp­nother­apy.” Erick­son made use of a more infor­mal con­ver­sa­tional approach with many clients and com­plex lan­guage pat­terns, and ther­a­peu­tic strate­gies. How­ever, this very diver­gence from tra­di­tion led some of his col­leagues, most notably Andre Weitzen­hof­fer, to dis­pute whether Erick­son was right to label his approach “hyp­no­sis” at all. Nev­er­the­less, Erickson’s work con­tin­ues to be one of the most influ­en­tial forces in mod­ern hypnotherapy.

The founders of Neu­rolin­guis­tic Pro­gram­ming (NLP), a method­ol­ogy sim­i­lar in some regards to hyp­no­tism, claimed that they had mod­elled the work of Erick­son exten­sively and assim­i­lated it into their approach. How­ever, other experts have dis­puted whether NLP bears any gen­uine resem­blance to Erickson’s work.

Cognitive/behavioral hyp­nother­apy

From the 1980s onward a grow­ing num­ber of clin­i­cal text­books writ­ten by con­tem­po­rary researchers such as Steven Jay Lynn, Irv­ing Kirsch, E. Thomas Dowd, William Golden, Assen Alladin, and oth­ers, began to appear. These com­bined hyp­nother­apy with ele­ments of cog­ni­tive and behav­iour ther­apy. In 1974, Theodore Bar­ber and his col­leagues pub­lished an influ­en­tial review of the research which argued, fol­low­ing the ear­lier social psy­chol­ogy of Theodore R. Sarbin, that hyp­no­tism was bet­ter under­stood not as a “spe­cial state” but as the result of nor­mal psy­cho­log­i­cal vari­ables, such as active imag­i­na­tion, expec­ta­tion, appro­pri­ate atti­tudes, and moti­va­tion. Bar­ber intro­duced the term “cognitive-behavioral” to describe the non­state the­ory of hyp­no­tism, and dis­cussed its appli­ca­tion to behav­ior therapy.

The grow­ing appli­ca­tion of cog­ni­tive and behav­ioural psy­cho­log­i­cal the­o­ries and con­cepts to the expla­na­tion of hyp­no­sis paved the way for a closer inte­gra­tion of hyp­nother­apy with var­i­ous cog­ni­tive and behav­ioural ther­a­pies. How­ever, many cog­ni­tive and behav­ioural ther­a­pies were them­selves orig­i­nally influ­enced by older hyp­nother­apy tech­niques, e.g., the sys­tem­atic desen­si­ti­sa­tion of Joseph Wolpe, the car­di­nal tech­nique of early behav­ior ther­apy, was orig­i­nally called “hyp­notic desen­si­ti­sa­tion” and derived from the Med­ical Hyp­no­tism (1948) of Lewis Wol­berg. The tra­di­tional style of hyp­nother­apy can be seen as a pre­cur­sor of cognitive-behavioral ther­apy inso­far as both place empha­sis upon “com­mon sense” the­o­ret­i­cal expla­na­tions and the use of relax­ation, and rehearsal of pos­i­tive ideas and imagery in ther­apy. Mod­ern cog­ni­tive ther­apy pri­mar­ily dif­fers from pre­vi­ous hyp­nother­apy approaches by plac­ing much greater empha­sis upon the direct Socratic dis­pu­ta­tion of neg­a­tive beliefs. How­ever, cognitive-behavioural hyp­nother­a­pists, like those men­tioned in this sec­tion, have assim­i­lated this tech­nique along­side their use of hypnosis.